<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cardiophile MD Archive &#187; Nuclear cardiology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cardiophile.net/category/nuclear-cardiology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cardiophile.net</link>
	<description>Archive of Cardiophile MD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rest and nitroglycerine myocardial viability scan</title>
		<link>http://www.cardiophile.net/2009/11/rest-and-nitroglycerine-myocardial-viability-scan.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cardiophile.net/2009/11/rest-and-nitroglycerine-myocardial-viability-scan.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnson Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear cardiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myocardial viability scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitroglycerine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=3407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rest and nitroglycerine 99mTc myocardial viability scan Click on the image for an enlarged view Rest images were obtained after intravenous administration of 8 mCi of 99mTc. 25 mCi of 99mTc was injected after 5 mg of sublingual nitroglycerine hours later and rest gated images obtained. Exercise was deferred in view of clinical background of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cardiophile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nuclear-scan.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3409" title="nuclear scan" src="http://www.cardiophile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nuclear-scan-small.jpg" alt="nuclear scan" width="500" height="364" /></a></p>
<h4 style="text-align: center;">Rest and nitroglycerine 99mTc myocardial viability scan</h4>
<h5 style="text-align: center;">Click on the image for an enlarged view</h5>
<p>Rest images were obtained after intravenous administration of 8 mCi of 99mTc. 25 mCi of 99mTc was injected after 5 mg of sublingual nitroglycerine hours later and rest gated images obtained. Exercise was deferred in view of clinical background of triple vessel disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Rest images showed a moderately dilated left ventricle and no pulmonary uptake of tracer. Perfusion abnormality was noted in the inferior wall and inferolateral segments. There was some improvement of perfusion with nitroglycerine. Gated SPECT analysis showed global hyokinesia with a global ejection fraction of about 23%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cardiophile.net/2009/11/rest-and-nitroglycerine-myocardial-viability-scan.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99mTc myocardial perfusion imaging</title>
		<link>http://www.cardiophile.net/2009/09/anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99mtc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cardiophile.net/2009/09/anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99mtc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnson Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear cardiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99m Tc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99m Tc scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc myocardial perfusion imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc myocardial perfusion scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc tetrofosmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc tetrofosmin heart scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[99mTc tetrofosmin scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anterior and inferior wall infarct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myocardial perfusion imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myocardial viability assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfusion scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technetium Heart Scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technetium Scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viability study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiophile.org/?p=2780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. 25 mci of 99mTc tetrofosmin was administered for stress imaging and 8 mci for rest imaging. This person was asymptomatic at 9.1 METS of Bruce protocol on treadmill exercise. Lateral wall is seen to be well perfused and there is no infarct in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2781" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.cardiophile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99m-Tc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2781" title="Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging" src="http://www.cardiophile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99m-Tc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging.jpg" alt="Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging" width="500" height="296" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging</p></div>
<p>Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. 25 mci of 99mTc tetrofosmin was administered for stress imaging and 8 mci for rest imaging. This person was asymptomatic at 9.1 METS of Bruce protocol on treadmill exercise. Lateral wall is seen to be well perfused and there is no infarct in the lateral wall. Non transmural infarct is seen in the anterior wall, septum and inferior wall. There is very little reversible ischemia. Hence there may not be any benefit from revascularisation of the coronary artery involved.</p>
<div id="attachment_2783" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.cardiophile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99m-Tc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging-full.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2783" title="Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging -fulll" src="http://www.cardiophile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99m-Tc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging-full-small.jpg" alt="Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging -full" width="500" height="369" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Anterior and inferior wall infarct on 99m Tc myocardial perfusion imaging -full</p></div>
<p>Click on the image for a larger view</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cardiophile.net/2009/09/anterior-and-inferior-wall-infarct-on-99mtc-myocardial-perfusion-imaging.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
